The government must change its business rate reform plans to incentivise growth in every area
Article
The government’s plans to hand over 100 per cent of business rates revenue to local authorities (LAs) currently risks failing on its objective to grow local economies. Richer LAs will receive strong incentives to grow, but for many poorer councils the rewards are minimal.
Many aspects are yet to be agreed, but four important announcements have already been made, including:
- Income in the first year will be determined by need for funding;
- In subsequent years, every extra pound of business rates will be retained locally;
- The existing ‘levy’ on ‘disproportionate’ business rates growth will be abolished;
- There will be a safety net for areas that see little or no growth.
Based on all government announcements so far IPPR has modelled what the government’s new scheme might mean for richer and poorer LAs respectively.
Example of a poorer, ‘top-up’ authority:
- A poorer LA such as Barnsley with a funding need of around £120 million in 2019/20 and local business rates of around £50 million will receive £120 million in the first year.
- But £70 million will come from a ‘top-up’ which is then frozen in real terms annually.
- Thus a 2 per cent increase in business rates will yield just 0.8 per cent in additional retained income.
Example of a richer, ‘tariff’ authority:
- For a richer authority like South Bucks, business rates are worth around £30 million and there is a funding need of circa £1 million – leaving a tariff of around £29 million.
- Thus a 2 per cent increase would yield 50 per cent in additional retained income in a single year.
Without a change in direction, the current proposals are likely to see weak incentives where they are most needed, and excessive gains where there are already ample funds for investment. Moreover, cancelling the levy could cost £170 million a year. If this is found from the existing safety net, the minimum funding floor could fall to less than 70 per cent of funding need, rather than the 92.5 per cent in the present system.
IPPR’s new report, Better rates, sets out an alternative proposal.
Our ‘growth first’ scheme retains the spirit of the present consultation, but performs better against the government’s own objective of providing incentives to grow. We propose that any increase in a council’s funding after the first year is calculated through multiplying its business rates growth rate by its funding need.
This gives all LAs an equal incentive to grow. For example, both Barnsley and South Bucks would see a 2 per cent rise in business rates receipts translate to a 2 per cent rise in their retained income. Furthermore, the ‘growth first’ scheme would also generate the funds for a safety net, without the need fora levy.
Although further devolution of tax and spending power is welcome, our analysis shows that a system of fiscal devolution based on business rates alone has significant limitations. It is an enormous challenge to balance the importance of providing good incentives to drive local economic growth, with the need for a system that is fair and transparent, particularly where there is such a high level of local and regional inequality – and our current uncertain economic outlook.
Related items
Forging ahead: Deciding the direction of IPPR's Migration Policy Unit
In our last blog post for the Migration Policy Unit we shared our new way of working as we endeavour to be inclusive and transparent in our policymaking process. In this blog we set out what our first and flagship project is for the policy…Who gets a good deal? Revealing public attitudes to transport in Great Britain
Transport isn’t working. That’s the message from the British public. This is especially true if you’re on a low income, disabled or living in the countryside. The cost of living crisis has exposed the shortcomings of our transport system,…Bhargav Srinivasa Desikan on TalkTV discussing AI
IPPR's Bhargav Srinivasa Desikan on TalkTV discussing his new report on the impact of generative AI on the UK labour market.