Energy efficiency: Who pays and who benefits?
Published date: 17 Dec 2012
Download full publication
ECO is a new programme that aims to improve the energy efficiency of homes in Great Britain. Only a limited number of people will be able to benefit from ECO but the cost of the policy will be borne by all energy bill-payers. This report assesses what those costs might be and how the benefits and costs will be distributed.
Coming into force on 1 January 2013, ECO is a programme that will cost suppliers an estimated £1.3 billion a year. In what marks a radical change from previous supplier obligations, ECO will oblige suppliers to deliver high-cost energy efficiency improvements and improve households that are fuel-poor. Households that are not eligible for support through ECO will have the option of installing measures at no up-front cost through the Green Deal. Unlike the policies it replaces, it explicitly aims to address both carbon emissions and fuel poverty.
If government estimates are accurate then the cost of ECO will replace, roughly pound-for-pound, the costs created by the current policies, worth about £50 a year in the average annual household energy bill. However, analysis of previous policies suggests that the government's estimates could be much too low or too high, which means the cost to consumers could dip to £20 or soar to £116 a year.
There are also concerns that lack of capacity and resources at the local authority level could undermine the scheme's ability to reduce carbon emissions at the lowest cost possible, and that suppliers may find it difficult to identify and engage efficiently and accurately suitable fuel-poor households.
The report's recommendations include:
- An early review to consider which measures are eligible under ECO, including the possibility of extending the policy to include loft and cavity wall insulations.
- Government support for local authority involvement in the form of a £40 million investment in local authority staff and resources.
- Close monitoring of suppliers’ progress towards achieving the fuel poverty target in ECO to identify whether this target is deliverable and cost-effective.
- A pilot of the 'Low-Cost, Low-Efficiency Area' (LILEA) approach to targeting resources at fuel-poor homes, which could be significantly more efficient and cost-effective than current methods.
- Suppliers should be required to submit detailed information on the costs of delivering their ECO obligations, which should be independently verified.
Reg Platt, Senior Research Fellow
Author(s) : Will Straw - 13 Sep 2013
You may be interested in...
IPPR in the news
Making it hard for politicians to ignore the young
Telegraph - 07 Mar 2014£100bn red alert over green energy gap
The Independent - 06 Mar 2014Impact of immigrants on British workers ‘negligible’
The Independent - 06 Mar 2014Will Straw on moving beyond coal power
Guardian - 04 Mar 2014
Ed Cox on Why London is such a powerful force in the UK (2.55 in)
BBC Today - 04 Mar 2014The north holds the key to a better economy
Manchester Everning News - 04 Mar 2014Net migration soars despite Cameron's pledge
Daily Telegraph - 28 Feb 2014NEET generation
The Independent - 27 Feb 2014
More BBC indie commissions, report says
Radio Today - 27 Feb 2014BBC boss wants to extend licence fee to cover iPlayer
Daily Mirror - 27 Feb 2014Scotland: Vote 'Yes' and lose the BBC
The Independent - 27 Feb 2014Indy Scotland would be a vote to “leave” the BBC
The Scotsman - 27 Feb 2014
Tony Hall: extend licence fee to cover iPlayer
The Guardian - 27 Feb 2014Maria Miller says independent Scotland would lose the BBC
The Guardian - 27 Feb 2014Hall vows to protect drama under further cost-cutting
The Stage - 27 Feb 2014Hall proposes licence fee extension to include iPlayer
BBC News Online - 27 Feb 2014
Harman at OMC: 'Daily Mail should apologise'
The Guardian - 27 Feb 2014Time to break London's grip on creative industries
BBC Wales Today - 25 Feb 2014UK's creative industries 'must back regional and ethnic diversity'
The Guardian - 25 Feb 2014Creative industries need to be freed from London's 'closed shop'
WalesOnline - 25 Feb 2014