Guest workers: Settlement, temporary economic migration and a critique of the government's plans
Settlement is a complex and difficult policy area, demanding close attention to the detail of direct and indirect effects of policy changes and the practicality of compliance or enforcement – as well as questions of fairness and community cohesion.
The government is consulting on a radical policy shift, aimed at reducing dramatically the number of non-EU economic migrants who have the right or opportunity to settle in the UK, which show insufficient evidence of having considered these questions, or of heeding the lessons from similar policies in other countries, past and present.
Under the new proposals, only a few exceptional categories would be invited to stay, in particular the very wealthy. The rest would have to leave after a maximum of five years – regardless of how well they are doing in their job, what contribution they have made, and what roots they have put down in the local community (other than through marriage or civil partnership with a permanent resident).
The proposed approach – in effect, making virtually all non-EU economic migration temporary – is impractical, likely to be damaging in economic and social terms, and unusually for a ‘tough’ immigration policy may even prove unpopular with the public.
This report sets out four key questions the government must answer about its proposed rule changes, and makes a series of recommendations, should the proposals be implemented in their current form. It also provides a progressive framework for managing temporary migration, focused less on compulsory removal than on reinforcing the trend towards temporary migration that is already underway.
Matt Cavanagh, Associate Fellow
In the news
UK may deter most needed migrants
The Financial Times (£) - 21 Nov 2011
Author(s) : Matt Cavanagh - 29 Feb 2012
Author(s) : Matt Cavanagh - 02 Feb 2012
Author(s) : Matt Cavanagh - 03 Nov 2011
You may be interested in...
IPPR in the news
Who benefits from welfare?
Prospect £ - 23 May 2013UK higher education: let's not follow the leader but develop our own vision
The Guardian - 22 May 2013Mervyn King's housing warning is too little, too late
The Guardian - 21 May 2013Nigel Farage and Alex Salmond trade insults in battle of nationalists
The Guardian - 20 May 2013
Local solutions are the key to full employment
New Statesman, Staggers blog - 20 May 2013Exam fail kids are facing jobs woe
The Sun - 15 May 2013Will Ed Miliband be the Doctor Who of politics?
The Telegraph - 14 May 2013Labour will not be able to meet child poverty targets, says thinktank chief
The Guardian - 13 May 2013
Slave-to-work dads ‘being squeezed out of family life,' says MP Jon Cruddas
Manchester Evening News - 13 May 2013Laptop U: Has the future of college moved online?
The New Yorker - 13 May 2013Ed Cox on 'two-speed Britain'
Observer - 12 May 2013Francis Maude to consider fixed terms for top mandarins
Financial Times (£) - 12 May 2013
Childcare reforms in chaos
Daily Mirror - 10 May 2013Sarah Mulley on the Queen's speech (2 mins 55s)
Channel 4 News - 09 May 2013Queen's Speech 2013: Economist Attacks Immigration Curbs
Huffington Post - 09 May 2013Follow Macmillan and build, build, build
New Statesman - 08 May 2013
School inspections deeply toxic, thinktank says
The Guardian - 08 May 2013School League Tables Damaging To Students' Vocational Education, Warns IPPR
Huffington Post - 08 May 2013A common sense policy to create jobs and combat what ails Britain
The Independent - 07 May 2013250,000 children could suffer due to league table changes
The Telegraph - 07 May 2013