Guest workers: Settlement, temporary economic migration and a critique of the government's plans
Settlement is a complex and difficult policy area, demanding close attention to the detail of direct and indirect effects of policy changes and the practicality of compliance or enforcement – as well as questions of fairness and community cohesion.
The government is consulting on a radical policy shift, aimed at reducing dramatically the number of non-EU economic migrants who have the right or opportunity to settle in the UK, which show insufficient evidence of having considered these questions, or of heeding the lessons from similar policies in other countries, past and present.
Under the new proposals, only a few exceptional categories would be invited to stay, in particular the very wealthy. The rest would have to leave after a maximum of five years – regardless of how well they are doing in their job, what contribution they have made, and what roots they have put down in the local community (other than through marriage or civil partnership with a permanent resident).
The proposed approach – in effect, making virtually all non-EU economic migration temporary – is impractical, likely to be damaging in economic and social terms, and unusually for a ‘tough’ immigration policy may even prove unpopular with the public.
This report sets out four key questions the government must answer about its proposed rule changes, and makes a series of recommendations, should the proposals be implemented in their current form. It also provides a progressive framework for managing temporary migration, focused less on compulsory removal than on reinforcing the trend towards temporary migration that is already underway.
Matt Cavanagh, Associate Fellow
In the news
UK may deter most needed migrants
The Financial Times (£) - 21 Nov 2011
Author(s) : Matt Cavanagh - 29 Feb 2012
Author(s) : Matt Cavanagh - 02 Feb 2012
Author(s) : Matt Cavanagh - 03 Nov 2011
You may be interested in...
IPPR in the news
Transport infrastructure spend just £245 in the North
The Independent on Sunday - 09 Dec 2013Decentralise housing and transport powers
New Statesman - 09 Dec 2013North South infrastructure plan divide
The Independent - 06 Dec 2013Tax relief for childcare won't make it cheaper
The Telegraph - 06 Dec 2013
We need a green economy
BBC News - 06 Dec 2013Retrain people in their 50s and 60s
The Financial Times (£) - 05 Dec 2013Transport infrastructure spending far higher in London
The Spectator - 05 Dec 2013Universities should pay a living wage
Times Higher Education - 05 Dec 2013
Tax free childcare will not cut childcare costs
Nursery World - 05 Dec 2013Parents thousands of pounds worse of with Govt's tax relief plan
The Telegraph - 04 Dec 2013New competitors in the energy market
The Independent - 04 Dec 2013Areas like London must prep for Romanian and Bulgarian migrants
BBC News - 04 Dec 2013
Cuts to ECO are a panicky response
The Guardian - 03 Dec 2013Green deal loan take up pitiful
The Guardian - 03 Dec 2013Scottish independence a long shot
The Week in Parliament - 03 Dec 2013Increasing income tax allowance won't help the poor
The Guardian - 03 Dec 2013
An unanswerable case for NHS reform
The Guardian - 02 Dec 2013Pay care providers on outcome not activity
The Guardian - 02 Dec 2013Shore up community relations to help with migrants
The Observer - 02 Dec 2013Not intelligent to clamp down on foreign students
The Independent - 02 Dec 2013