England and the Union: How and why to answer the West Lothian question
This report recommends a series of changes to existing procedures within the UK parliament to overcome the practical implications of the West Lothian question, which asks how can it be right after devolution that non-English MPs still get to vote on English domestic matters. The proposed solution includes a vote in the House of Commons to determine whether a bill should be treated 'as if' it applied to England only and the creation of a new 'English grand committee' to conduct the usual report stage for such 'England-only' bills.
The West Lothian question is an anomaly. It follows from having devolved legislatures for some of the UK but not for England.
Today, there are three factors at play which, taken together, might elevate the question from a theoretical anomaly into an issue that demands an answer: political divergence within the British union, the number and significance of various national groups of MPs, and whether or not the English people themselves see it as a problem.
Now, a strong case can be made for addressing the question: perhaps most importantly, English voters may be beginning to see themselves as a political unit, and three-quarters of them think that this matters. It is arguably better to accommodate measured change now than to be forced into something damaging, in an unmanaged way, at a later date.
The report weighs procedural change against other options, including increased English regionalism, the creation of an English parliament and a 'devolution discount' on non-English MPs in the Commons, and also assesses two earlier proposals for similar change, made by Sir Malcolm Rifkind in 2007 and Kenneth Clarke in 2008.
In the news
A step closer to English votes on English laws?
Conservativehome - 25 Mar 2013
You may be interested in...
IPPR in the news
North South infrastructure plan divide
The Independent - 06 Dec 2013Tax relief for childcare won't make it cheaper
The Telegraph - 06 Dec 2013We need a green economy
BBC News - 06 Dec 2013Retrain people in their 50s and 60s
The Financial Times (£) - 05 Dec 2013
Transport infrastructure spending far higher in London
The Spectator - 05 Dec 2013Universities should pay a living wage
Times Higher Education - 05 Dec 2013Tax free childcare will not cut childcare costs
Nursery World - 05 Dec 2013Parents thousands of pounds worse of with Govt's tax relief plan
The Telegraph - 04 Dec 2013
New competitors in the energy market
The Independent - 04 Dec 2013Areas like London must prep for Romanian and Bulgarian migrants
BBC News - 04 Dec 2013Cuts to ECO are a panicky response
The Guardian - 03 Dec 2013Green deal loan take up pitiful
The Guardian - 03 Dec 2013
Scottish independence a long shot
The Week in Parliament - 03 Dec 2013Increasing income tax allowance won't help the poor
The Guardian - 03 Dec 2013An unanswerable case for NHS reform
The Guardian - 02 Dec 2013Pay care providers on outcome not activity
The Guardian - 02 Dec 2013
Shore up community relations to help with migrants
The Observer - 02 Dec 2013Not intelligent to clamp down on foreign students
The Independent - 02 Dec 2013Lib-Lab coalition is possible after next election, says Chris Huhne
The Times (£) - 29 Nov 2013Area-based scheme could cover 117k more houses than ECO
The Guardian - 29 Nov 2013