The true cost of energy: How competition and efficiency in the energy supply market impact on consumers’ bills
Author(s): Reg Platt
Published date: 30 Apr 2012
Download full publication Purchase via print on demand
This report sets out to establish what impact a lack of competition in the energy supply market is having on consumers’ energy bills. We conclude that there is a lack of competition in the energy supply market and that some consumers are paying over the odds as a result.
There is a need for greater fairness in terms of costs charged to energy consumers. People cannot choose to ‘opt out’ of buying energy. Regulation of the supply market must aim to produce beneficial outcomes for the majority of consumers and not simply those that are most active, particularly at a time of high unemployment and when incomes are squeezed.
We put forward recommendations for increasing competition in the energy supply market and exerting downward pressure on energy prices.
Some of our key findings are:
- Contrary to what we would expect from a competitive market, operational costs per customer account across suppliers have diverged since 2007: that is, the gap between the most and least efficient provider in terms of operational costs has gotten wider.
- Costs to suppliers of delivering environmental and social policies may be as much as £9 per customer per year less than Ofgem has reported.
- Taking a moderate view of the effect of increased competition on household energy prices, we estimate average potential savings of £70 per year by 2020. This is equivalent to the costs to consumers of the electricity market reform, the carbon price floor, the feed-in tariff (FIT), the warm home discount and most of the renewables obligation combined.
The report's core argument is summarised in the following infographic (click to enlarge or download as PDF):
Author(s) : Will Straw - 04 Mar 2013
Author(s) : Clare McNeil - 22 Nov 2012
Author(s) : Reg Platt - 22 Oct 2012
Author(s) : Reg Platt - 27 Apr 2012
You may be interested in...
IPPR in the news
Who benefits from welfare?
Prospect £ - 23 May 2013UK higher education: let's not follow the leader but develop our own vision
The Guardian - 22 May 2013Mervyn King's housing warning is too little, too late
The Guardian - 21 May 2013Nigel Farage and Alex Salmond trade insults in battle of nationalists
The Guardian - 20 May 2013
Local solutions are the key to full employment
New Statesman, Staggers blog - 20 May 2013Exam fail kids are facing jobs woe
The Sun - 15 May 2013Will Ed Miliband be the Doctor Who of politics?
The Telegraph - 14 May 2013Labour will not be able to meet child poverty targets, says thinktank chief
The Guardian - 13 May 2013
Slave-to-work dads ‘being squeezed out of family life,' says MP Jon Cruddas
Manchester Evening News - 13 May 2013Laptop U: Has the future of college moved online?
The New Yorker - 13 May 2013Ed Cox on 'two-speed Britain'
Observer - 12 May 2013Francis Maude to consider fixed terms for top mandarins
Financial Times (£) - 12 May 2013
Childcare reforms in chaos
Daily Mirror - 10 May 2013Sarah Mulley on the Queen's speech (2 mins 55s)
Channel 4 News - 09 May 2013Queen's Speech 2013: Economist Attacks Immigration Curbs
Huffington Post - 09 May 2013Follow Macmillan and build, build, build
New Statesman - 08 May 2013
School inspections deeply toxic, thinktank says
The Guardian - 08 May 2013School League Tables Damaging To Students' Vocational Education, Warns IPPR
Huffington Post - 08 May 2013A common sense policy to create jobs and combat what ails Britain
The Independent - 07 May 2013250,000 children could suffer due to league table changes
The Telegraph - 07 May 2013