Press Story

 

  • Gathering real-time patient feedback, unlocking staff insights and decentralising NHS resources and decisions are key, says IPPR 

  • New analysis suggests central targets, competition and regulation are less likely to deliver on intended goals 

  • Delivering government’s pledges on productivity and prevention would free £21bn a year and hold health spending near 8 per cent of GDP 
     

Unleashing the most effective drivers to transform the NHS could end the unsustainable rise in health spending and stabilise it as a share of GDP, according to an IPPR report published today. 

New economic modelling for the report, undertaken with LCP (see note 4), reveals that – if fulfilled – the government’s promises on productivity and prevention in the health service could contain DHSC spending in England at its current level of around 8 per cent of GDP by the end of this parliament. 

That is well below the current trajectory towards almost 10 per cent in a decade’s time - a level which critics say would be impossible to sustain - and would equate to a difference of £21 billion a year by the end of this parliament, IPPR says. 

Building an NHS fit for the future is a “life or death challenge”, the report says, with the health of the nation, the health of the economy and the public’s belief in the NHS itself all on the line. 

To bring long-term spending growth under control, the government needs to examine “ruthlessly” whether its established “levers of reform” are genuinely best, or whether other means are more likely to deliver the results it needs. 

After analysing the effectiveness of six common “reform levers” across health systems of comparable countries around the world, IPPR researchers concluded that the UK government should rely less on the familiar use of targets, competition and choice, and regulation, although all still have a role to “shore up performance”. 

Instead, IPPR urges the government to use three different levers that it says are waiting in the NHS toolkit and hold “particular promise” to deliver the transformation that the NHS needs: 

  • Unlocking insights from frontline staff, “a source of enormous untapped potential” for improving performance and transforming models of care. NHS trusts and systems must find new ways to involve such staff in transformation programmes and apply their insights to making the changes needed. 
     

  • Empowering patients and strengthening their voiceto drive a “feedback revolution” in the NHS, including through supporting patients to plan and manage their own care more effectively. 
     

  • Devolving power and resource within the NHS, with the abolition of NHS England just the “opening shot” in developing a new way to run the health service. Management and resources must be more widely distributed across the country so that the system responds better to the communities it serves – with more freedom locally to plan services and  decide how money should best be spent.   
     

Practical policies that could enable these approaches could include redistributing first-rate managers from NHS England and other central bodies to local health systems, jointly setting with them a small number of targets for broad health outcomes, and launching public feedback dashboards for improvement, the paper says. Also key would be investing in leadership, improving data use and engaging with staff to drive reform.
 

Dr Annie Williamson, IPPR research fellow, practising NHS doctor and lead author of the report, said: 
 

“To unlock better health for all without an unsustainable rise in spending, the government and NHS leaders need to look hard at the evidence on what works, and what doesn’t. We can’t afford to fail in this. 

“But the evidence we have uncovered suggests that the most common approaches taken over the last few years are less effective than many supposed. Too many overbearing central targets, too much reliance on regulation and inspections, and putting too much faith in competition as the silver bullet to transform care will not deliver what we need. 

Instead we need to make more use of different levers in the NHS toolkit – enabling frontline staff to make changes based on their own insights, gathering and acting on patient feedback in real time, and pushing staff, power and resources from the centre to local health systems. Between them, these are more likely to drive the reform the NHS so desperately needs.” 

Dame Patricia Hewitt, former health secretary, said: 

“To transform the NHS, we need more than a vision for change. What is required is a ruthless focus on the ‘how’ of reform – an evidenced-based, policy toolkit to turn big ambition into effective strategy. The IPPR provides just that.  

“As IPPR argues, building an NHS fit for the future means moving away from a centralised, command-and-control approach and towards a model which learns, adapts and improves based on the insights of those who use and work in NHS services. This is a must read for anyone involved in health policy and leadership.”  

ENDS 

Dr Annie Williamson, Sebastian Rees and Avnee Morjaria, the report’s authors, are available for interview. 

Annie Williamson is an IPPR research fellow and a practising NHS doctor 

Sebastian Rees is IPPR head of health and principal research fellow 

Avnee Morjaria is IPPR associate director for public services 

CONTACT 

David Wastell, Director of News and Communications: 07921 403651 d.wastell@ippr.org  

Liam Evans, Senior Digital and Media Officer: 07419 365334 l.evans@ippr.org 

NOTES TO EDITORS 

  1. The IPPR paper Realising the reform dividend: a toolkit to transform the NHS, by Annie Williamson, Sebastian Rees and Avnee Morjaria, is at: https://www.ippr.org/articles/reform-dividend-transform-NHS 
     

  1. Lane Clarke and Peacock (LCP), an actuarial, data and health analytics company, worked with IPPR to model healthcare expenditure projections for this report. Specifically, LCP’s Health Analytics practice modelled DHSC expenditure projections, by analysing trends in healthcare service use and unit costs since 2004/05 in England. This updates its previous analysis undertaken for the IPPR Commission on Health and Prosperity in September 2023: https://www.lcp.com/media/1150633/ippr_nhs_funding_scenarios.pdf 

 
IPPR worked with LCP to develop two core scenarios:  
a) History repeated: life expectancy follows ONS projections, with flat healthy life expectancy and NHS productivity growth of 0.5 per cent per annum in line with historical trends.  
b) Prevention and productivity as promised: productivity grows at 2 per cent per year, and the health mission to halve the gap in healthy life expectancy between regions is delivered by 2034/35. 
 

  1. Please note our estimates are not comparable to ONS estimates of health expenditure as a share of GDP, which are UK-wide and include non-governmental healthcare spend. 
     

  1. Analysis of the effectiveness of different ‘reform levers’ was based on an extensive (but non-systematic) literature review of the strongest available evidence over the past 20 years, including systematic reviews, NHS case studies and global models from comparable countries. Two researchers then independently rated each lever as ‘high’, ‘moderate’ or ‘low’ efficacy across five stated government priorities, as well as a three-point scale for cost and evidence quality. Full details are set out within the report.