More than a foot in the door: Job sustainability and advancement in London and the UK
Article
The labour market has changed dramatically since the 1980s. A more flexible labour market, with high numbers of part-time and temporary jobs, has made entry into work easier. But is there a price for this flexibility? The impact of labour market reforms present real trade-offs, but increased job security need not be at the expense of flexibility.
But the policy agenda gives little attention to the quality of jobs people move into or whether workers have opportunities to progress from entry-level jobs to jobs with more pay and better working conditions. The skills system is poorly coordinated with employment support, and there are no incentives built into the Work Programme to encourage providers to support people not only to stay in work but also to advance.
In this paper, we extend our recommendations on welfare-to-work to consider job sustainability and advancement. We argue that the support offered by welfare-to-work providers to help people to stay in work and progress should be more innovative, including active engagement with employers to improve the quality of jobs available and the creation of specific training routes into jobs or sectors. We argue that providing support for people to move into jobs with higher pay and better working conditions, either at the same firm or a different one, will help to improve sustainability in work.
Related items
Pathfinding: The route to competitive green manufacturing in the UK
Transformed by AI: How generative artificial intelligence could affect work in the UK – and how to manage it
Technological change is a good thing. It has brought exponential gains to living standards and is the foundation of modern society. Yet unmanaged technological change has always come with risks and disruptions.Celebrating 20 years of IPPR North
For two decades IPPR North has been at the centre of the debate about how to rebalance England's regions. Here we take stock of how far we have come and the role we have played in shaping the "levelling up" debate.