No train, no gain: Beyond free-market and state-led skills policy
Article
This report explores why employers do not train. We show that a lack of investment in training is rooted in 'low-road' competitive strategies that do not require a well-skilled workforce. While often profitable, these business models have implications for employees, consumers and the state.
Our goal is to support and encourage more firms to adopt competitive strategies that support higher job quality, and at the same time improve the dynamism, innovativeness and resilience of English firms. The weakness of the institutional fabric in England makes this a challenging agenda to pursue.
We advocate an evolutionary approach to reform that responds to the unique contexts in different sectors and locations, and so a key feature is likely to be variability, from one place or sector to another.
Specifically, the report recommends:
- Democratise sector skills councils, to include boards made up of one-third employer representatives, one-third employee representatives and one-third representatives of the state and other stakeholder interests.
- Devolve decision-making power to SSCs to determine strategic funding priorities for skills in their sector and control a combined growth, innovation and training budget.
- Establish local skills boards at the level of local enterprise partnerships.
- A something-for-something deal with employers to ensure membership of skills boards is mandatory but beneficial.
- A new role for further education colleges to deliver more high-level off-the-job training.
- A focus on high-quality workforce training and development, with qualifications developed by industry stakeholders.
- Funding investment to ensure that all adults have access to a high-quality basic education, and other sources of funding are found to pay for the proposed workforce training and business development services.
Related items
Transformed by AI: How generative artificial intelligence could affect work in the UK – and how to manage it
Technological change is a good thing. It has brought exponential gains to living standards and is the foundation of modern society. Yet unmanaged technological change has always come with risks and disruptions.Celebrating 20 years of IPPR North
For two decades IPPR North has been at the centre of the debate about how to rebalance England's regions. Here we take stock of how far we have come and the role we have played in shaping the "levelling up" debate.Costing the Rwanda plan
Total payments to Rwanda for removing this cohort of people could range between £1.1 billion and £3.9 billion.