
Accountability matters: Securing the future of devolution
Article
English local government faces major reshaping.
England’s new mayors will join a group of highly visible leaders. But large-scale mayoral authorities are unfamiliar in England, and they will need to establish their credibility and legitimacy with the electorate.
It is a commonplace in commentary on English devolution that mayors need to be ‘accountable’ or ‘held to account’. Yet it is hard to determine what ‘accountability’ comprises, or how to know when a decision-maker has been ‘held to account’.
There is no shortage of governance procedures operating in the name of ‘accountability’. It is less clear whether they are sufficient to assuage fears of mayors misusing power, or whether these procedures can create a sense of ownership and influence for voters. In this paper we set out proposals for how to deliver on improved accountability.
Related items

Making the most of it: Unitarisation, hyperlocal democratic renewal and community empowerment
Local government reorganisation need not result in a weakening of democracy at the local level.
The role of The Great North in delivering pan-northern investment
How The Great North partnership can help bring more public and private investment to the North.
The evolution of devolution: How the English devolution and community empowerment bill can go further
The government’s early commitment to broadening and deepening devolution in England is very welcome, but the bill must be bold enough to make change that people can see and feel.