The Regulatory State Labour and the utilities 1997-2002
Article
Drawing on his experience as a special adviser in the DTI and DTLR between 1997 and 2002, ippr's former senior economist Dan Corry analyses developments in how the state regulates public utilities. While Labour has continued to put competition and the consumer first, it has significantly improved many of the details of the regulatory process. Above all, the Labour Government has clarified that regulation remains at heart a political process that demands the state set a clear policy framework for balancing a range of policy objectives.
Dan Corry emphasises that the key issue now facing regulation policy is how to reconcile environmental objectives with the central focus of policy on promoting competition and delivering the lowest price to the consumer.
Related items

Reimagining lawmaking: How to rebuild trust in parliament
People feel that politics is something that is done to them, not with them. This must change.
Constructive coalitions? What the election means for the seventh session of the Scottish parliament
What do the results of the 2026 Scottish parliament election tell us about how Scottish politics is changing? What do progressive parties need to do to get back on track?
Work isn't working: Family, work and progression on a low income
Most children in poverty in the UK are in working households, a phenomenon that has emerged since the early 2000s.