The Regulatory State Labour and the utilities 1997-2002
Article
Drawing on his experience as a special adviser in the DTI and DTLR between 1997 and 2002, ippr's former senior economist Dan Corry analyses developments in how the state regulates public utilities. While Labour has continued to put competition and the consumer first, it has significantly improved many of the details of the regulatory process. Above all, the Labour Government has clarified that regulation remains at heart a political process that demands the state set a clear policy framework for balancing a range of policy objectives.
Dan Corry emphasises that the key issue now facing regulation policy is how to reconcile environmental objectives with the central focus of policy on promoting competition and delivering the lowest price to the consumer.
Related items
Delivery vs deliberation? Lessons in law-making from the last parliament
The new government should take a different approach to law-making to pass laws that are more effective and to improve the quality of our democracy.Scotland’s new climate legislation risks repeating mistakes of the past
A bold alternative is needed that asks decision makers to be explicit about the changes they will support, not just a headline target figureStronger rights, better results: Managers’ attitudes to workers’ rights
Labour’s manifesto pledged to strengthen employees’ protections at work.