A job for everyone: What should full employment mean in 21st century Britain?
What does Osborne's commitment to full employment really mean?Article
By reducing levels of both unemployment and inactivity among the working-age population, policies designed to increase the employment rate could help to raise the incomes of low-income households, and ease the burden on the tax and benefit system. Adopting full employment as a goal also presents opportunities to address both regional inequalities and those associated with gender and disability, and to enable more people to access the paid work which is vital for a sense of social identity, participation and wellbeing in modern society.
This report briefly reviews employment policy and outcomes in the UK, and developments in the labour force, throughout the postwar period. It then considers the potential benefits of full employment for individuals, families and the state - and the potential trade-offs between employment on the one hand and inflation, real wages and productivity on the other - before finally setting out a vision of what full employment might look like, and how it should be defined.
Related items

What is the left for?: The case for a politics of reciprocism
Liberal democratic capitalism has failed to give many people good lives, and the future looks less promising than the past.
Wildfires and climate change | Dave Hawkey from IPPR Scotland speaks to Lewis Goodall on LBC
Europe’s heatwaves and the wildfires in the Cairngorms are a stark reminder that climate extremes are here. The Scottish government must act now with a clear plan to prepare for what's coming.
“I feel quite unsettled and unsafe”: Young people, belonging, and the broken promise of childhood
Young people in England feel less secure, supported and connected than a decade ago. Based on nearly 200 conversations, this blog explores why childhood feels more stressful and less joyful.