A job for everyone: What should full employment mean in 21st century Britain?
What does Osborne's commitment to full employment really mean?Article
By reducing levels of both unemployment and inactivity among the working-age population, policies designed to increase the employment rate could help to raise the incomes of low-income households, and ease the burden on the tax and benefit system. Adopting full employment as a goal also presents opportunities to address both regional inequalities and those associated with gender and disability, and to enable more people to access the paid work which is vital for a sense of social identity, participation and wellbeing in modern society.
This report briefly reviews employment policy and outcomes in the UK, and developments in the labour force, throughout the postwar period. It then considers the potential benefits of full employment for individuals, families and the state - and the potential trade-offs between employment on the one hand and inflation, real wages and productivity on the other - before finally setting out a vision of what full employment might look like, and how it should be defined.
Related items

Scotland: Taxed enough already? Maybe not
It is possible to make the case for progressive increases in income tax while in government. You can win the argument, and the world won’t come to an end.
Fairness first: How the budget can make life better and the economy stronger
The chancellor faces a daunting task at the upcoming budget. A fiscal gap sets the stage, putting the chancellor in the unenviable position of having to raise taxes.
Towards a fair and proportional property tax