A job for everyone: What should full employment mean in 21st century Britain?
What does Osborne's commitment to full employment really mean?Article
By reducing levels of both unemployment and inactivity among the working-age population, policies designed to increase the employment rate could help to raise the incomes of low-income households, and ease the burden on the tax and benefit system. Adopting full employment as a goal also presents opportunities to address both regional inequalities and those associated with gender and disability, and to enable more people to access the paid work which is vital for a sense of social identity, participation and wellbeing in modern society.
This report briefly reviews employment policy and outcomes in the UK, and developments in the labour force, throughout the postwar period. It then considers the potential benefits of full employment for individuals, families and the state - and the potential trade-offs between employment on the one hand and inflation, real wages and productivity on the other - before finally setting out a vision of what full employment might look like, and how it should be defined.
Related items
Taken to heart: Inequalities in heart disease in Scotland
More than 7.6 million people across the UK live with cardiovascular disease (CVD), around twice as many as live with Alzheimer’s disease and cancer combined.Skills passports: An essential part of a fair transition
This month, government will publish its Clean Energy Workforce Strategy. This plan covers two aims. First, filling the growing demand for skills in clean energy industries is essential to keep on track to reach the government’s clean power…Fixing the leak: How to end the £22 billion annual taxpayer losses at the Bank of England
The Bank of England increased its interest rates over recent years, aimed at reducing inflation. But this has also had an unintended effect on the Bank of England’s massive government bond buying – ‘quantitative easing’ – programme.