A Question of Balance
Article
The Barker Review of Land Use Planning has been widely attacked as bad for cities: loosening the green belt, damaging town centres and undermining local democracy. But others felt the Review should have gone a lot further. Who is right?
This paper assesses Barker, exploring the role of planning in urban growth. It finds a case for managed reviews to green belts. But the jury is out on reforming the 'town centre first' approach, and proposals for planning major infrastructure need further work.
The forthcoming Planning White Paper should take forward Barker's more sensible proposals. But the Government must tread carefully, improving local planners' capacity before it introduces any major reforms.
Centre for Cities has re-launched as an independent think tank. You can visit them online at http://www.centreforcities.org.
Related items

The democratic citizen: Renewing citizenship and the public domain
Britain’s debate about ‘citizenship’ has narrowed to a question of the boundaries of our national community.
The British business investment visa: A new model for investment migration in the UK
We recommend a new approach to investment migration in the UK focussed on maximising economic benefits and minimising the risks of abuse.
"Primary is what comes first": How end of key stage 2 exams impact disadvantaged children
End of primary school tests need reform to work better for the children who need the most support at school.