A Question of Balance
Article
The Barker Review of Land Use Planning has been widely attacked as bad for cities: loosening the green belt, damaging town centres and undermining local democracy. But others felt the Review should have gone a lot further. Who is right?
This paper assesses Barker, exploring the role of planning in urban growth. It finds a case for managed reviews to green belts. But the jury is out on reforming the 'town centre first' approach, and proposals for planning major infrastructure need further work.
The forthcoming Planning White Paper should take forward Barker's more sensible proposals. But the Government must tread carefully, improving local planners' capacity before it introduces any major reforms.
Centre for Cities has re-launched as an independent think tank. You can visit them online at http://www.centreforcities.org.
Related items
Mission-driven industrial relations: The case for fair pay agreements
How fair pay agreements could support the government’s mission-based approach by resolving labour market challenges.Women in Scotland: the gendered impact of care on financial stability and well-being
Women in Scotland are far likelier than men to take on childcare and other caring responsibilities, which puts them at an economic disadvantage.ÂCitizenship: A race to the bottom?
The ability to move from temporary immigration status to settlement, and ultimately to citizenship, is the cornerstone of a fair and functional immigration system.