A Question of Balance
Article
The Barker Review of Land Use Planning has been widely attacked as bad for cities: loosening the green belt, damaging town centres and undermining local democracy. But others felt the Review should have gone a lot further. Who is right?
This paper assesses Barker, exploring the role of planning in urban growth. It finds a case for managed reviews to green belts. But the jury is out on reforming the 'town centre first' approach, and proposals for planning major infrastructure need further work.
The forthcoming Planning White Paper should take forward Barker's more sensible proposals. But the Government must tread carefully, improving local planners' capacity before it introduces any major reforms.
Centre for Cities has re-launched as an independent think tank. You can visit them online at http://www.centreforcities.org.
Related items

English devolution and migration: A role for strategic authorities
As English devolution accelerates, strategic authorities are becoming more important actors in policy areas that shape how people settle, integrate and build lives in local communities.
Windrush Day: The unfinished business of immigration reform
Eight years after the Windrush scandal, its lessons remain highly relevant to debates about immigration policy today.
A generation apart? Youth politics, alienation and democratic renewal in Britain
Public debate about young people and politics is loud, contested – and largely wrong.