A race to the top, middle or bottom? The consequences of decentralisation in Germany

Has decentralisation in Germany led to a 'race to the bottom' among its states?

Article

When constitutional reforms delegated new responsibilities to Germany's states in 2006, many predicted they would lead to damaging competition between them in many aspects of policy. However, in terms of its impacts on prisons policy, care home regulation and civil servant pay, the story so far has been much more mixed.

There has been a trend towards greater decentralisation from the level of the nation state across the world in recent decades, but such transfers of power are seldom uncontentious. Advocates of decentralisation claim that it allows policies to be better tailored to their contexts, give greater capacity for experimentation, innovation and lesson-drawing, and also (more controversially) acts as a check on central power. Its opponents are fearful either of policy incoherence or – more problematically still – downward pressure on levels of service provision or entitlement, regulation and taxation, as a result of states competing with each other in order to remain competitive.

This essay examines the impact of Germany's 2006 federalism reforms, which transferred certain competencies from the level of the nation state to the regions, or L??nder. It starts by briefly examining the literature on the possible impacts of a decision to decentralise power, and then sketches the German context and the nature of these 2006 reforms. It then examines the changes that have occurred since responsibilities were transferred in three areas of policy: prisons, the regulation of care homes, and pay and conditions for Beamte, an employment category which includes most public servants.

It finds only limited evidence of 'races to the bottom', and rather more evidence of upward pressure on standards. It also uncovers some support for cooperation between regions, even where this is no longer legally required. Together, these findings give cause for scepticism about grand claims that decentralisation will lead to a 'race to the bottom'. Among other factors, the likely policy response to decentralisation depends to a large extent on the policy area in question, and on what the budgetary impact of policy variation would be.

Related items

  1. Two young children run playing underneath a rainbow canopy in a park or garden

    It takes a village: Empowering families and communities to improve children's health

    How can we build the healthiest generation of children ever?

  2. Scotland: Taxed enough already? Maybe not

    It is possible to make the case for progressive increases in income tax while in government. You can win the argument, and the world won’t come to an end.  
  3. The Houses of Parliament and Big Ben, River Thames and Westminster Bridge

    Fairness first: How the budget can make life better and the economy stronger

    The chancellor faces a daunting task at the upcoming budget. A fiscal gap sets the stage, putting the chancellor in the unenviable position of having to raise taxes.