Alternatives to Child Immigration Detention: What are the options for the Coalition government?
Article
We believe the government deserves credit for confirming that they will end this inhumane and ineffective policy, and for establishing a review into alternatives to the practice. However, ending child detention clearly raises significant challenges for the government which are proving difficult to overcome.
This briefing provides some background to the developments in this area, and sets out how two important principles can and should be put into practice by the government.
Those principles are:
- first, ending the detention of children must mean ending the detention of families.
- second, the government is entitled to remove families with children from the UK once they have exhausted their rights of appeal, and any change in policy must facilitate rather than frustrate return in these circumstances.
Recommendations in the briefing paper include:
- formalising the involvement of refugee and migrant-supporting organisations
- ensuring asylum seekers are aware of the possibility of return early in the asylum process
- the use of alternatives to detention, such as tagging and reporting, and
- ensuring the government is able to enforce returns.
Related items
Navigating in the fog: Why the OBR should hold its nerve on the productivity forecast
The fiscal watchdog is under pressure to downgrade its forecast, costing the chancellor billions – but this would be premature.Everyday concerns: What people want from transport
Transport has a key role to play in achieving the UK government's missions and improving lives.Reforming gambling taxation: How to lift half a million children out of poverty
A key priority for the government’s upcoming child poverty strategy should be to remove the two-child limit and scrap the household benefit cap.