Autumn statement 2011
Article
This was more like a mini-budget than an autumn statement. The likelihood that the OBR's forecasts - and particularly its downgrading of the growth outlook - would dominate the next day's headlines caused the government to preannounce a series of measures designed to support growth. The aim, no doubt, was to give the impression that the government had a 'plan for growth' as well as a 'plan for deficit reduction'.
However, it is not enough to agree a number of measures - even if some of them are welcome U-turns from the government's previous position - and call them a 'plan for growth'. A real plan for growth should start by identifying what is needed for the economy to grow.
In the short term that means generating additional demand. With our main export market heading into recession and household and business confidence low, only the government is in a position to provide this extra demand. However, this would mean relaxing the pace of deficit reduction; that was a U-turn that the chancellor was not prepared to make on this occasion.
Related items

Restoring security: Understanding the effects of removing the two-child limit across the UK
The government’s decision to lift the two-child limit marks one of the most significant changes to the social security system in a decade.
Building a healthier, wealthier Britain: Launching the IPPR Centre for Health and Prosperity
Following the success of our Commission on Health and Prosperity, IPPR is excited to launch the Centre for Health and Prosperity.
A ‘paradigm shift’ in asylum and immigration policy?
In 2019, a package of asylum reforms known as the ‘paradigm shift’ was passed by a broad party consensus in the Danish parliament.