
Bismarck versus Beveridge revisited: Does the model shape the outcome?
Article
The NHS is under serious pressure.
In this context, old questions have re-emerged with renewed force: are the NHS’s core principles – free-at-the-point-of-use and funded through general taxation – still fit for purpose?
In this report, we analyse data from 22 OECD countries to examine evidence on alternative funding approaches – principally social health insurance systems, as used in France, Germany and the Netherlands – and their relationship to performance indicators across five domains: capacity, access, equity, quality, and efficiency.
We find that the causes of poor NHS performance are not structural but practical, and set out four areas in which targeted investment would make the most difference for the NHS.
Related items

Putting cardiovascular disease at the heart of policymaking: Learning from research in the devolved nations
Deaths from heart attacks and strokes have halved since the 1960s and people living with these conditions have seen remarkable improvements in managing and treating them. But now progress is stalling.
Seb Rees on GB News discussing NHS funding

The heart health divide: Cardiovascular inequalities in Wales
Our third blog on cardiovascular disease in the devolved nations turns the spotlight on Wales.