Can the Big Society be a fair society? A North East perspective

Article

This report draws on workshops involving 150 voluntary community sector and social enterprise organisations working in the North East to provide a critical analysis of some of the key policies the government has put forward under the banner of the 'Big Society'. It also asks a crucial question: will the Big Society be a fair society?

The Big Society agenda is a key priority for the government. Aspiring to reshape relationships between the citizen and the state, it has already altered the policy landscape. Voluntary and community sector (VCS) and social enterprise organisations are crucial intermediaries between the state and local communities. But many face a difficult future as public sector spending cuts start to bite.

Identifying four tests of fairness - access to resources, 'losers', power distribution and accountability - the report makes a number of recommendations in response to the Big Society agenda, highlighting the importance of community organisers and public sector procurement, clarifying the role of the 'civic service' and the Big Society Bank, and promoting seedcorn grants and matched giving to support enterprise and VCS activities.

Related items

  1. Graphic depicting a stack of pound coins in the background and one sideways pound coin displayed on its side in the foreground

    The full-speed economy: Does running a hotter economy benefit workers?

    How a slightly hotter economy might be able to boost future growth.
  2. The outside of Rochdale town hall on a sunny day, with flowers in the foreground

    Making the most of it: Unitarisation, hyperlocal democratic renewal and community empowerment

    Local government reorganisation need not result in a weakening of democracy at the local level.
  3. West Midlands Metro Tram at Victoria Square in Birmingham city centre during 2022 Commonwealth Games

    Transport and growth: Reforming transport investment for place-based growth

    The ability to deliver transformative public transport is not constrained by a lack of ideas, public support or local ambition. It is constrained by the way decisions are taken at the national level.