Changing States: A progressive agenda for political reform in the Middle East
Article
The issue of political reform in the Middle East has never been higher on the international agenda. But it was pushed up that agenda not by progressive governments or political parties - those for whom democracy, human rights, gender equality and social justice are supposed to be defining values - but rather by a right-wing neo-Conservative administration in the United States.
In response to the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001, significant voices in the US policy community called for a fundamental shift in US strategy towards the Middle East. They argued that the region's lack of liberty was a primary cause of Islamic extremism, and that addressing the region's 'democracy deficit' was essential to stem the growth of global terrorism and to enhance the security of the US and its Allies.
The paper has three specific purposes. Firstly, it seeks to assess honestly the current state of the region, the challenges that it faces and how these have arisen. Secondly, it aims to provide a critique of existing 'reform' policies towards the Middle East, particularly those of the current US administration but also those pursued by some European governments. Thirdly, it proposes a distinctively 'progressive' agenda for supporting political reform in the region.
Related items

Strike while AI is hot: Rebuilding worker power for the age of AI
How worker power should be reanimated in the face of AI-driven labour market shocks.
The Europe agenda: Defence and security
In this period of geopolitical chaos, greater defence and security integration offer a fruitful way for the UK to deepen its relationship with Europe.
A tough hand: Why rising youth inactivity demands urgent action
On Thursday, new data will likely show the number of young people who will be out of education, employment or training (NEET) will surpass 1 million for the first time since 2013.