Cutting the deficit: There is an alternative

Article

The Spending Review on 20 October is certain to be one of the most significant political events of this Parliament. The country is braced for spending cuts on a scale without precedent in the post-war period.

Progressive economists believe the Coalition's plan for rapid and deep deficit reduction will put at risk the fragile economic recovery and undermine prospects for future growth and shared prosperity.

However, beyond simple protest, it is incumbent upon those who are critical of the Coalition government's plans to propose credible and costed alternatives. This briefing paper sets out to do just that.

In summary, ippr's alternative plan for deficit reduction states that the government should:

- Maintain investment on capital projects

- Reduce the underlying deficit more slowly

- Maintain a 65:35 ratio between spending cuts and taxes

- Accept that the 20% rate of VAT will not be reversed

- Tax universal benefits

- Lift the ring-fence on NHS spending.

Related items

  1. A photo of a hospital corridor. A bed on wheel sits waiting while a person in scrubs runs away blurred in the distance

    Bismarck versus Beveridge revisited: Does the model shape the outcome?

    The NHS is under serious pressure.
  2. A close up photo of a lit up mobile phone screen. A woman's hands hold it, mostly in darkness

    Stuck on you: How to make social media good again

    How social media has changed over the last 20 years to make us more isolated from each other online, and what needs to change.

  3. Holding it together: Can the government deliver on community cohesion?

    The government’s long-awaited cohesion action plan, Protecting What Matters, marks a genuine step forward - clarifying the role of the state in promoting community resilience.