Devising an Electoral System for the 21st Century: The case for AMS
Article
Generally in discussions about changes to the voting system it has been assumed the choice is between three options: AV, Alternative Vote Plus (AV+) or the Single Transferable Vote (STV).
However, this paper argues that it is the Additional Member System (AMS) which is most suited to the UK context. AMS combines the best elements of the current system with a rightful focus on proportionality, representation and fairness.
The paper begins with an assessment of the failings of the current FPTP system and the core arguments for genuine electoral reform. It then establishes a number of criteria which any new electoral system must satisfy. There is then an analysis of the various alternative electoral systems. Having concluded that AMS represents the most appropriate electoral system for the UK, the report concludes with an analysis of why AMS would be good for British political life in a wider sense.
Related items

Price caps and economic stability: How to manage the Iran war energy shock?
The Iran war energy shock will impose significant costs on the UK economy, even if the government does not offer a universal support package.
The political trust crisis: Why local democracy must start listening again
A troubling reality hangs over May’s local elections: trust in politics has collapsed.
Putting cardiovascular disease at the heart of policymaking: Learning from research in the devolved nations
Deaths from heart attacks and strokes have halved since the 1960s and people living with these conditions have seen remarkable improvements in managing and treating them. But now progress is stalling.