Devising an Electoral System for the 21st Century: The case for AMS
Article
Generally in discussions about changes to the voting system it has been assumed the choice is between three options: AV, Alternative Vote Plus (AV+) or the Single Transferable Vote (STV).
However, this paper argues that it is the Additional Member System (AMS) which is most suited to the UK context. AMS combines the best elements of the current system with a rightful focus on proportionality, representation and fairness.
The paper begins with an assessment of the failings of the current FPTP system and the core arguments for genuine electoral reform. It then establishes a number of criteria which any new electoral system must satisfy. There is then an analysis of the various alternative electoral systems. Having concluded that AMS represents the most appropriate electoral system for the UK, the report concludes with an analysis of why AMS would be good for British political life in a wider sense.
Related items
Delivery vs deliberation? Lessons in law-making from the last parliament
The new government should take a different approach to law-making to pass laws that are more effective and to improve the quality of our democracy.Scotland’s new climate legislation risks repeating mistakes of the past
A bold alternative is needed that asks decision makers to be explicit about the changes they will support, not just a headline target figureStronger rights, better results: Managers’ attitudes to workers’ rights
Labour’s manifesto pledged to strengthen employees’ protections at work.