Devo-Then, Devo-Now: What can the history of the NHS tell us about localism and devolution in health and care?
Article
These initiatives – and in particular the devo-health ‘experiment’ in Greater Manchester – throw up a range of questions for policy makers and the public. How much power should be passed down to the local level within health and care? Who should they be passed down to? What should local leaders do with these new freedoms? Will this process lead to the democratisation of health and care decisions and speed up reform? Or, will it hinder the ability to deliver an efficient and effective health and care system?
Over the last year or so, IPPR has been looking to answer these questions from a contemporary perspective. However, we also recognise that historians of the British health system will likely feel a sense of déjà vu as they look at these developments. For questions of how to reconcile the goals of a national service (fairness, efficient use of resources) with the benefits of devolved powers (democratic control, community integration) are not new. Indeed, they go right back to the creation of NHS in 1948.
It is our hope that this set of essays, authored by leading historians of both the health and care system and the decentralisation of public services, will help shed light on some of the debates, feeding into the ongoing discussions at national and local level about the role of localism and centralisation within health and care. We hope you find them both interesting and informative.
Related items
State of the North 2025 - The kids aren't alright: How to deliver for young people in the North
This year’s State of the North report highlights how regional inequality exacerbates the growing challenges facing many young northerners.The transport challenge for low-income households
Many people living on low incomes in the UK are limited in their ability to access the building blocks of a good life because of poor transport provision.Towards universal opportunity for young people
Outlining a vision for young people which could increase social mobility while also reducing inequality and disadvantage, so that every young person has the opportunity to build a decent life.