Devolution in Practice 2006
Article
"A perceptive, pioneering analysis of the policy consequences flowing from devolution across the UK."
Wendy Alexander MSP
"Most Westminster based politicians and journalists are ignorant about the impact of devolution. They should read this new collection, which goes beyond the constitutional debate to look at important differences in policies and policymaking, as well as common values, attitudes and pressures across the whole UK. This has direct implications for the debate over decentralisation in England."
Peter Riddell, Chief Political Commentator of The Times and Chair of the advisory board of the ESRC research programme on devolution.
"Mark I of ippr's study of the effects of devolution
explored the development of differences both of policy and process between the 'national' administrations. Mark II pursues this theme further, but perhaps more importantly begins to anticipate the problems of an inadequate constitutional framework. In the absence of constitutional protection for minimum common standards, the influence of England's choices on the funding formula may prove to be the critical determinant of the options for the rest. The dreaded West Lothian Question is likely to be raised in
earnest.Watch out for Mark III."
James Cornford, Founder Director of ippr
Related items

Empowering people to hold tech accountable
We need reform to remove structural barriers to people and civil society taking direct action against tech companies in UK courts – putting more power in the hands of people.
Earned settlement: Decision time
The government is imminently due to announce plans for a new model of ‘earned settlement’. These are expected to represent the most significant reforms to indefinite leave to remain in a generation.
What comes next: A fairer approach to primary assessment
England’s primary school accountability and assessment system is not working well for disadvantaged children.