Devolution in Practice 2006
Article
"A perceptive, pioneering analysis of the policy consequences flowing from devolution across the UK."
Wendy Alexander MSP
"Most Westminster based politicians and journalists are ignorant about the impact of devolution. They should read this new collection, which goes beyond the constitutional debate to look at important differences in policies and policymaking, as well as common values, attitudes and pressures across the whole UK. This has direct implications for the debate over decentralisation in England."
Peter Riddell, Chief Political Commentator of The Times and Chair of the advisory board of the ESRC research programme on devolution.
"Mark I of ippr's study of the effects of devolution
explored the development of differences both of policy and process between the 'national' administrations. Mark II pursues this theme further, but perhaps more importantly begins to anticipate the problems of an inadequate constitutional framework. In the absence of constitutional protection for minimum common standards, the influence of England's choices on the funding formula may prove to be the critical determinant of the options for the rest. The dreaded West Lothian Question is likely to be raised in
earnest.Watch out for Mark III."
James Cornford, Founder Director of ippr
Related items

Brexit 10 years on: Time the North took back control through devolution
Today marks 10 years since the UK’s referendum on whether to leave or remain in the European Union.
English devolution and migration: A role for strategic authorities
As English devolution accelerates, strategic authorities are becoming more important actors in policy areas that shape how people settle, integrate and build lives in local communities.
Windrush Day: The unfinished business of immigration reform
Eight years after the Windrush scandal, its lessons remain highly relevant to debates about immigration policy today.