Doubling down: Why increasing the personal tax allowance yet again is still poor value for money
Budget week: Why increasing the personal tax allowance (again) would be poor value for money (still)Article
There is now a fair bit of well-informed budget speculation in the air. One of the more likely measures is a further increase in the personal tax allowance (PTA). Both Coalition parties are committed to increasing the PTA in the next parliament, and cutting taxes before an election is always a popular move among politicians. So a mooted further rise in the PTA from the currently planned hike to £10,600 in April to £11,000 seems like an eminently plausible feature of this week's budget announcement.
Using the IPPR tax-benefit model, we estimate that this would cost £2.1 billion a year. Assuming that the chancellor also proceeds with increasing the higher-rate tax threshold by 1 per cent as planned, the distributional impact across families (rather than individual taxpayers) looks like this:
Related items
Mission-driven industrial relations: The case for fair pay agreements
How fair pay agreements could support the government’s mission-based approach by resolving labour market challenges.Women in Scotland: the gendered impact of care on financial stability and well-being
Women in Scotland are far likelier than men to take on childcare and other caring responsibilities, which puts them at an economic disadvantage.Citizenship: A race to the bottom?
The ability to move from temporary immigration status to settlement, and ultimately to citizenship, is the cornerstone of a fair and functional immigration system.