Doubling down: Why increasing the personal tax allowance yet again is still poor value for money
Budget week: Why increasing the personal tax allowance (again) would be poor value for money (still)Article
There is now a fair bit of well-informed budget speculation in the air. One of the more likely measures is a further increase in the personal tax allowance (PTA). Both Coalition parties are committed to increasing the PTA in the next parliament, and cutting taxes before an election is always a popular move among politicians. So a mooted further rise in the PTA from the currently planned hike to £10,600 in April to £11,000 seems like an eminently plausible feature of this week's budget announcement.
Using the IPPR tax-benefit model, we estimate that this would cost £2.1 billion a year. Assuming that the chancellor also proceeds with increasing the higher-rate tax threshold by 1 per cent as planned, the distributional impact across families (rather than individual taxpayers) looks like this:

Related items

Towards a Communities Agenda 2.0
Andy Burnham’s arrival in Downing Street creates an opportunity to go much further on the communities agenda than we’ve seen up to now. So what should more ambition look like in practice?
Raising the bar: Strengthening living standards while banning exploitative zero-hours contracts
Labour’s manifesto committed to banning exploitative zero-hours contracts as part of sweeping upgrades to workers’ rights.
Beyond headroom: Why we need a better fiscal framework to fix the UK’s long term problems
There has been long-standing debate about the UK’s fiscal rules and fiscal framework.