Doubling down: Why increasing the personal tax allowance yet again is still poor value for money
Budget week: Why increasing the personal tax allowance (again) would be poor value for money (still)Article
There is now a fair bit of well-informed budget speculation in the air. One of the more likely measures is a further increase in the personal tax allowance (PTA). Both Coalition parties are committed to increasing the PTA in the next parliament, and cutting taxes before an election is always a popular move among politicians. So a mooted further rise in the PTA from the currently planned hike to £10,600 in April to £11,000 seems like an eminently plausible feature of this week's budget announcement.
Using the IPPR tax-benefit model, we estimate that this would cost £2.1 billion a year. Assuming that the chancellor also proceeds with increasing the higher-rate tax threshold by 1 per cent as planned, the distributional impact across families (rather than individual taxpayers) looks like this:

Related items

It takes a village: Empowering families and communities to improve children's health
How can we build the healthiest generation of children ever?
Scotland: Taxed enough already? Maybe not
It is possible to make the case for progressive increases in income tax while in government. You can win the argument, and the world won’t come to an end.
Fairness first: How the budget can make life better and the economy stronger
The chancellor faces a daunting task at the upcoming budget. A fiscal gap sets the stage, putting the chancellor in the unenviable position of having to raise taxes.