European welfare states after the crisis
Article
When it comes to making reforms to the welfare system, defending existing social security entitlements at the expense of families and children, is the public's preferred choice, according to a major piece of new comparative YouGov polling in the UK, Denmark and France. Centre-left parties must face up to tough choices and take political risks if they want to maintain fiscal credibility and at the same time continue to tackle family poverty and extend early years opportunities in an era of austerity: they must be prepared to develop new arguments and find new ways of talking about fairness that justifies additional spending on children and families.
Authors Patrick Diamond and Guy Lodge argue:
'The crisis looks to be shoring up the 'old' welfare state edifice at precisely the moment when Europe's welfare states ought to be adapting in the light of major structural challenges.'
A significant danger identified by Diamond and Lodge is that growing inequalities in electoral participation might further entrench the welfare status quo and heighten the onset of intergenerational and distributional conflict.
Published in partnership with Policy Network and The Foundation for European Progressive Studies (FEPS).
Related items
Mission-driven industrial relations: The case for fair pay agreements
How fair pay agreements could support the government’s mission-based approach by resolving labour market challenges.Women in Scotland: the gendered impact of care on financial stability and well-being
Women in Scotland are far likelier than men to take on childcare and other caring responsibilities, which puts them at an economic disadvantage.ÂCitizenship: A race to the bottom?
The ability to move from temporary immigration status to settlement, and ultimately to citizenship, is the cornerstone of a fair and functional immigration system.