European welfare states after the crisis
Article
When it comes to making reforms to the welfare system, defending existing social security entitlements at the expense of families and children, is the public's preferred choice, according to a major piece of new comparative YouGov polling in the UK, Denmark and France. Centre-left parties must face up to tough choices and take political risks if they want to maintain fiscal credibility and at the same time continue to tackle family poverty and extend early years opportunities in an era of austerity: they must be prepared to develop new arguments and find new ways of talking about fairness that justifies additional spending on children and families.
Authors Patrick Diamond and Guy Lodge argue:
'The crisis looks to be shoring up the 'old' welfare state edifice at precisely the moment when Europe's welfare states ought to be adapting in the light of major structural challenges.'
A significant danger identified by Diamond and Lodge is that growing inequalities in electoral participation might further entrench the welfare status quo and heighten the onset of intergenerational and distributional conflict.
Published in partnership with Policy Network and The Foundation for European Progressive Studies (FEPS).
Related items

Navigating a world between orders: Launching the Centre for Geopolitics and International Policy
Following a successful first phase of our international programme, IPPR has launched the Centre for Geopolitics and International Policy (CGIP).
Analysis of industry claims about the effects of higher gambling taxes
Our response to the backlash from the gambling industry on calls for higher taxes.
Rethinking child poverty through enrichment accounts
Every child should have access to activities that build confidence, skills, and opportunity, regardless of income.