Greasing the wheels: Getting our bus and rail markets on the move
Article
This report focuses on the relationship between public and private stakes in rail services, and differences between bus services in London and elsewhere.
Our analysis examines the pros and cons of existing policy for both of these transport markets. While policy for London buses seems to be performing reasonably well, there are challenges facing rail which need addressing, though these pale in comparison to those facing bus markets outside London.
Policy recommendations for rail cover:
- allowing public sector rail operators to compete for franchises, including as part of a joint venture with private companies
- handing responsibility for franchising decisions to the Office of Rail Regulation
- encouraging train operating companies (TOCs) to contribute more towards infrastructure costs and reduce the burden on taxpayers
Recommendations focused on bus services outside London include:
- giving greater powers and responsibilities to local bodies to shape local bus markets
- replicating the Transport for London (TfL) model at the city-region and combined authority level
- greater integration of transport spending and services by health and education providers (such as hospital shuttles and school buses)
- a new long-term, national transport strategy, to be written and owned by the Department for Transport.
Related items

New world, new relationship: Our future with Europe
Britain’s assumptions about its place in the world no longer hold, upturned by Russian aggression, American unreliability and Chinese coercion.
A durable majority?: How public opinion on the EU performs under pressure
A decade on from Brexit, Andy Burnham has signalled that a reassessment of the UK’s relationship with the EU might be around the corner.
Allies for delivery: Rebuilding faith in Scottish politics via the North Sea
Can Scottish politicians still build enough of a consensus to deliver meaningful change for disillusioned voters?