How should competition policy react to coronavirus?

Article

In addition to causing loss of life on a tragic scale, coronavirus, and the lockdown policies to suppress and reverse its spread, are causing great short-term economic disruption. They will also have lasting economic consequences. Competition and consumer protection authorities can and should play an important role in addressing the short-term harm to consumers and markets and, at least as important, can and should contribute to a robust and sustainable post-crisis recovery over the longer term.

Competition authorities have a huge task ahead of them. They will need to adapt and refocus their work in response to the reshaping of the economy that will occur as it recovers from the coronavirus recession. The crisis has further highlighted pre-existing deficiencies in the legal framework for competition and consumer protection law; unless these are addressed, the task of adaptation will be all the greater.

This paper is split in to two parts. The first outlines briefly the work that the CMA is currently undertaking to respond rapidly and robustly to the immediate threats to competitive outcomes for consumers (for example, concerns over price gouging, firms not honouring the right to a refund on cancellation of services). The second part looks at the potential longer-term contribution of competition policy to the recovery.

Related items

  1. Must try harder: do the Holyrood 2026 manifestos meet our tests?

  2. An energy smart meter sits on a countertop. It reads electricity: £61.71, gas: £148

    Flex factor: How government can keep network costs on bills down

    Government must strike a better balance between bringing down energy bills now and building a system fit for the future.

  3. Acceleration is not a strategy: A framework for directing AI towards public value before it's too late

    The politics of artificial intelligence is set to drastically change in 2026 as recent technical breakthroughs get implemented across the economy.