How should competition policy react to coronavirus?

Article

In addition to causing loss of life on a tragic scale, coronavirus, and the lockdown policies to suppress and reverse its spread, are causing great short-term economic disruption. They will also have lasting economic consequences. Competition and consumer protection authorities can and should play an important role in addressing the short-term harm to consumers and markets and, at least as important, can and should contribute to a robust and sustainable post-crisis recovery over the longer term.

Competition authorities have a huge task ahead of them. They will need to adapt and refocus their work in response to the reshaping of the economy that will occur as it recovers from the coronavirus recession. The crisis has further highlighted pre-existing deficiencies in the legal framework for competition and consumer protection law; unless these are addressed, the task of adaptation will be all the greater.

This paper is split in to two parts. The first outlines briefly the work that the CMA is currently undertaking to respond rapidly and robustly to the immediate threats to competitive outcomes for consumers (for example, concerns over price gouging, firms not honouring the right to a refund on cancellation of services). The second part looks at the potential longer-term contribution of competition policy to the recovery.

Related items

  1. Will technology reduce the cost of delivering public services?

    This is the third in a series of blogs related to IPPR Scotland’s project on ‘Employment, Productivity and Reform in the Scottish Public Sector’ funded by the Robertson Trust. 
  2. Graphic depicting a stack of pound coins in the background and one sideways pound coin displayed on its side in the foreground

    The full-speed economy: Does running a hotter economy benefit workers?

    How a slightly hotter economy might be able to boost future growth.
  3. The outside of Rochdale town hall on a sunny day, with flowers in the foreground

    Making the most of it: Unitarisation, hyperlocal democratic renewal and community empowerment

    Local government reorganisation need not result in a weakening of democracy at the local level.