In aid of India? Defining a positive role for the UK
Article
Business investment and personal remittances between the UK and India vastly outweigh the value of British government aid. These non-aid flows are crucial to people in both countries, and could provide greater benefits. This report recommends new approaches that the British government, British businesses, British investors and non-resident Indians based in Britain should adopt in order to enhance the impact of all these flows.
Given the outstanding development challenges facing India, the UK government's decision to end aid in 2015 looks both premature and politically motivated. Instead of ending aid at an arbitrary point in time, government should set out an 'exit strategy' for aid which specifies the development goals, relating to poverty and other objectives in recipient countries, to be met before aid is withdrawn. Ensuring that all stakeholders (including the British public) are clear about the rationale for exit is critical to this.
The government's sudden and unexpected changes represent a missed opportunity to reshape the UK's political debate on aid. With the right framework in place, India could provide an exemplar for how Britain eventually ends its direct overseas aid operations as countries grow and develop.
Related items

The full-speed economy: Does running a hotter economy benefit workers?
How a slightly hotter economy might be able to boost future growth.
Making the most of it: Unitarisation, hyperlocal democratic renewal and community empowerment
Local government reorganisation need not result in a weakening of democracy at the local level.
Transport and growth: Reforming transport investment for place-based growth
The ability to deliver transformative public transport is not constrained by a lack of ideas, public support or local ambition. It is constrained by the way decisions are taken at the national level.