Investing for the future: Why we need a British Investment Bank
Article
This report presents a detailed blueprint for what a British Investment Bank should look like in order to be fully effective in filling a gap in the UK banking system.
The idea of such a Bank has been around for a number of years, but only in the last five has it achieved any prominence in public debate. In September the business secretary, Vince Cable, announced tentative plans for a British Investment Bank.
IPPR's report examines the models provided for national investment banks by international case studies and sets out the main lessons that emerge.
It says that a British Investment Bank should have the following features:
- Operation: The Bank should be 100 per cent state-owned but there must be a clear dividing line between the role of government and the activities of bankers in making lending decisions
- Scope: A fully fledged British Investment Bank should be able to invest in infrastructure projects and to provide long-term financing for small and medium-sized businesses across the whole economy
- Size: The government should inject an initial £40 billion of capital over four years into the Bank, and the Bank should be allowed to raise funds on capital markets up to a leverage ratio of 2.5:1 (that is, up to an initial £100 billion).
Related items

The full-speed economy: Does running a hotter economy benefit workers?
How a slightly hotter economy might be able to boost future growth.
Making the most of it: Unitarisation, hyperlocal democratic renewal and community empowerment
Local government reorganisation need not result in a weakening of democracy at the local level.
Transport and growth: Reforming transport investment for place-based growth
The ability to deliver transformative public transport is not constrained by a lack of ideas, public support or local ambition. It is constrained by the way decisions are taken at the national level.