Public Value and E-Government
Article
This paper calls for new ways of defining and evaluating e-government
This paper calls for new ways of defining and evaluating e-government. Too many people discuss e-government as if it meant nothing more than putting services online. Important activity, such as the use of ICT by teachers in the classroom or the use of ICT on the ward or in the GPs surgery escapes their attention. Similarly, much evaluation work on e-government turns up little of relevance for key policy issues and debates. The problem here is not simply that our evaluation frameworks are not good enough or not deployed often enough. It is that the things we choose to measure are not things which demonstrate the relevance of e-government to all those who care passionately about the future of the public services.
Related items

What is the left for?: The case for a politics of reciprocism
Liberal democratic capitalism has failed to give many people good lives, and the future looks less promising than the past.
Wildfires and climate change | Dave Hawkey from IPPR Scotland speaks to Lewis Goodall on LBC
Europe’s heatwaves and the wildfires in the Cairngorms are a stark reminder that climate extremes are here. The Scottish government must act now with a clear plan to prepare for what's coming.
“I feel quite unsettled and unsafe”: Young people, belonging, and the broken promise of childhood
Young people in England feel less secure, supported and connected than a decade ago. Based on nearly 200 conversations, this blog explores why childhood feels more stressful and less joyful.