Public Value and E-Government
Article
This paper calls for new ways of defining and evaluating e-government
This paper calls for new ways of defining and evaluating e-government. Too many people discuss e-government as if it meant nothing more than putting services online. Important activity, such as the use of ICT by teachers in the classroom or the use of ICT on the ward or in the GPs surgery escapes their attention. Similarly, much evaluation work on e-government turns up little of relevance for key policy issues and debates. The problem here is not simply that our evaluation frameworks are not good enough or not deployed often enough. It is that the things we choose to measure are not things which demonstrate the relevance of e-government to all those who care passionately about the future of the public services.
Related items

Must try harder: do the Holyrood 2026 manifestos meet our tests?

Flex factor: How government can keep network costs on bills down
Government must strike a better balance between bringing down energy bills now and building a system fit for the future.
Acceleration is not a strategy: A framework for directing AI towards public value before it's too late
The politics of artificial intelligence is set to drastically change in 2026 as recent technical breakthroughs get implemented across the economy.