Public Value and E-Government
Article
This paper calls for new ways of defining and evaluating e-government
This paper calls for new ways of defining and evaluating e-government. Too many people discuss e-government as if it meant nothing more than putting services online. Important activity, such as the use of ICT by teachers in the classroom or the use of ICT on the ward or in the GPs surgery escapes their attention. Similarly, much evaluation work on e-government turns up little of relevance for key policy issues and debates. The problem here is not simply that our evaluation frameworks are not good enough or not deployed often enough. It is that the things we choose to measure are not things which demonstrate the relevance of e-government to all those who care passionately about the future of the public services.
Related items

Navigating in the fog: Why the OBR should hold its nerve on the productivity forecast
The fiscal watchdog is under pressure to downgrade its forecast, costing the chancellor billions – but this would be premature.
Everyday concerns: What people want from transport
Transport has a key role to play in achieving the UK government's missions and improving lives.
Reforming gambling taxation: How to lift half a million children out of poverty
A key priority for the government’s upcoming child poverty strategy should be to remove the two-child limit and scrap the household benefit cap.