Purchasing power: Making consumer markets work for everyone
Article
Living standards of households in the UK have fallen over the last six years due to a combination of exceptionally low increases in wages and larger increases in prices. Substantial rises in the price of essentials, including energy, public transport and childcare, have been a particular problem for some families, with those on the lowest incomes feeling the biggest squeeze because they spend more, proportionately, on these items.
In some markets, consumers are fighting back, for example by using networks to expand their knowledge of markets. The internet has facilitated the development of websites that compare prices and the quality of goods and services, making it easier for consumers to make the right decisions.
But some markets are so complex that they require special analysis and regulation. In this paper, we consider four such markets:
- energy
- public transport
- childcare
- housing.
The common theme in these four markets is that attempts to deliver goods and services through competition have been tried and failed.
Making markets more competitive – reducing the power of oligopolies, increasing consumer information and banning practices designed to exploit consumers – is the best approach for many consumer markets. But complex markets require more complex and innovative solutions. In these cases, the choice is not between trying to make markets freer or reintroducing regulation (or even nationalisation). Instead, it should be about finding alternative ways of achieving the best deal for consumers.
Related items

The full-speed economy: Does running a hotter economy benefit workers?
How a slightly hotter economy might be able to boost future growth.
Making the most of it: Unitarisation, hyperlocal democratic renewal and community empowerment
Local government reorganisation need not result in a weakening of democracy at the local level.
Transport and growth: Reforming transport investment for place-based growth
The ability to deliver transformative public transport is not constrained by a lack of ideas, public support or local ambition. It is constrained by the way decisions are taken at the national level.