Safeguarding Civilians: Delivering on the responsibility to protect in Africa
Article
In September 2005, at a meeting of the United Nations in New York, the world's leaders endorsed an international 'responsibility to protect': an obligation to act to protect civilians in the face of war crimes or genocide, where the government locally is perpetrating these abuses itself or is unable or unwilling to stop them.
Although there has been some real progress over the last six years in building support for this idea of a responsibility to protect, there is still a large gap between normative commitments endorsed at UN meetings and the actual practice of governments faced with instances of war crimes.
Indeed, the central challenge today in respect of the responsibility to protect is not normative but operational: how to actually protect civilians from mass killing, war crimes and genocide. That is the focus of this ippr report.
Related items

Price caps and economic stability: How to manage the Iran war energy shock?
The Iran war energy shock will impose significant costs on the UK economy, even if the government does not offer a universal support package.
The political trust crisis: Why local democracy must start listening again
A troubling reality hangs over May’s local elections: trust in politics has collapsed.
Putting cardiovascular disease at the heart of policymaking: Learning from research in the devolved nations
Deaths from heart attacks and strokes have halved since the 1960s and people living with these conditions have seen remarkable improvements in managing and treating them. But now progress is stalling.