Safeguarding Civilians: Delivering on the responsibility to protect in Africa

Article

In September 2005, at a meeting of the United Nations in New York, the world's leaders endorsed an international 'responsibility to protect': an obligation to act to protect civilians in the face of war crimes or genocide, where the government locally is perpetrating these abuses itself or is unable or unwilling to stop them.

In September 2005, at a meeting of the United Nations in New York, the world's leaders endorsed an international 'responsibility to protect': an obligation to act to protect civilians in the face of war crimes or genocide, where the government locally is perpetrating these abuses itself or is unable or unwilling to stop them.

Although there has been some real progress over the last six years in building support for this idea of a responsibility to protect, there is still a large gap between normative commitments endorsed at UN meetings and the actual practice of governments faced with instances of war crimes.

Indeed, the central challenge today in respect of the responsibility to protect is not normative but operational: how to actually protect civilians from mass killing, war crimes and genocide. That is the focus of this ippr report.

Related items

  1. A mother and child from behind looking out of a window

    Restoring security: Understanding the effects of removing the two-child limit across the UK

    The government’s decision to lift the two-child limit marks one of the most significant changes to the social security system in a decade.
  2. A group of healthcare professionals sitting in a staff common room in a hospital in Newcastle

    Building a healthier, wealthier Britain: Launching the IPPR Centre for Health and Prosperity

    Following the success of our Commission on Health and Prosperity, IPPR is excited to launch the Centre for Health and Prosperity.
  3. The Home Office building in London

    A ‘paradigm shift’ in asylum and immigration policy?

    In 2019, a package of asylum reforms known as the ‘paradigm shift’ was passed by a broad party consensus in the Danish parliament.