The Covid shift: Working time in manufacturing, engineering, shipbuilding and aerospace
Article
There is a risk that high unemployment will further embed a culture of insecure work and low pay in the UK labour market. But the experience of the pandemic may also hold lessons for how work could be arranged more effectively in future, with greater agency in the workplace, and with more time for the important parts of our lives outside of paid labour. So too, learning the lessons from this crisis could have important implications for how policy should respond to the challenges of the coming decades, from automation to the climate and nature emergencies, which will also disrupt the economy and could reduce paid work available.
This paper sets out both how working time is organised, and the number of hours we work has changed during the pandemic. We examine the risks and opportunities presented by the coronavirus outbreak for a progressive vision of working time in the UK: the steady reduction of working hours with no loss in income, and greater autonomy and flexibility in relation to how and when work is performed. We focus on manufacturing and engineering roles, sectors often left out of the working time debate, but that bring different challenges to a progressive vision of working time than sectors that are primarily office-based.
Related items

Building a healthier, wealthier Britain: Launching the IPPR Centre for Health and Prosperity
Following the success of our Commission on Health and Prosperity, IPPR is excited to launch the Centre for Health and Prosperity.
A ‘paradigm shift’ in asylum and immigration policy?
In 2019, a package of asylum reforms known as the ‘paradigm shift’ was passed by a broad party consensus in the Danish parliament.
A return north: reflections on IPPR Scotland’s tenth anniversary conference
There’s nothing like moving away from Scotland to remind you just how Scottish you are.