The Limits to Limits: Is a cap on immigration a viable policy for the UK?
Article
As we approach a general election, all three main parties are keen to emphasise that they would be tough on immigration. The Liberal Democrats talk about a 'firm but fair system'; Labour emphasises its 'tough but flexible' Australian-style Points-Based System. But the Conservatives have gone a step further and have made a cap on immigration a headline policy. Although they have not set out the level at which such a cap might be set, they have talked about reducing annual net immigration below 100,000, and have also intimated their support for calls for annual net immigration to be reduced to around 40,000.
We should state from the outset that we think that a cap would be a bad idea, both in political and policy terms. We believe that immigration policy should be based on an assessment of the costs and benefits of migration, and on more effective communication with the public, rather than on a (more or less) arbitrary number. However, a cap is much discussed in the current political debate, and it is important to understand the implications of imposing one.
Related items

From strangers to citizens: Membership and belonging in an age of migration
Who should become a British citizen in an age of growing mobility and migration?
Rebuilding Scotland's "New Politics": a constructive parliament to build trust in Scottish politics
Political disillusionment is growing in Scotland, and policy is not delivering. MSPs who did not stand for re-election this year share how the parliament currently works and could be improved.
Harry Quilter-Pinner discusses rising borrowing costs on BBC News