The Limits to Limits: Is a cap on immigration a viable policy for the UK?
Article
As we approach a general election, all three main parties are keen to emphasise that they would be tough on immigration. The Liberal Democrats talk about a 'firm but fair system'; Labour emphasises its 'tough but flexible' Australian-style Points-Based System. But the Conservatives have gone a step further and have made a cap on immigration a headline policy. Although they have not set out the level at which such a cap might be set, they have talked about reducing annual net immigration below 100,000, and have also intimated their support for calls for annual net immigration to be reduced to around 40,000.
We should state from the outset that we think that a cap would be a bad idea, both in political and policy terms. We believe that immigration policy should be based on an assessment of the costs and benefits of migration, and on more effective communication with the public, rather than on a (more or less) arbitrary number. However, a cap is much discussed in the current political debate, and it is important to understand the implications of imposing one.
Related items

The full-speed economy: Does running a hotter economy benefit workers?
How a slightly hotter economy might be able to boost future growth.
Making the most of it: Unitarisation, hyperlocal democratic renewal and community empowerment
Local government reorganisation need not result in a weakening of democracy at the local level.
Transport and growth: Reforming transport investment for place-based growth
The ability to deliver transformative public transport is not constrained by a lack of ideas, public support or local ambition. It is constrained by the way decisions are taken at the national level.