The war on motorists: Myth or reality?
Article
This paper addresses the perception that there is a 'war' being waged on motoring: that government is using motorists as a 'cash cow' and that spending on roads and transport is failing to keep pace with increases in transport-related tax.
It sets out the costs of motoring both to individual drivers and to the public purse, compared to the cost of living and the costs of alternative transport modes, and it considers whether there are justifiable reasons for increased taxes on motoring.
Concluding that the so-called 'war on motoring' is a myth, and that private motoring costs have risen less than the general cost of living over the past 20 years, the paper makes five recommendations for a government response.
- Government should make every effort to avoid further delays in fuel duty increases.
- New ways should be found to reduce the non-motoring costs - the externalities - caused by road traffic.
- Government should make a clear statement of the importance of encouraging modal shifts away from driving and towards more sustainable forms of transport, such as walking, cycling and public transport.
- Improvements in public transport, walking and cycling facilities should be supported through an increase in government support for transport capital projects.
- Government should update its account of the wider costs of transport, including all externalities and incorporating new estimates and research.
Related items

Towards a fair and proportional property tax

In search of the Scottish economy's 'low-hanging fruit': IPPR Scotland responds to the Muscatelli report
The report is a serious and thoughtful analysis of what is and isn’t working in Scotland’s economic development eco-system.
Celebrating 10 years of IPPR Scotland
In celebration of our 10th anniversary, IPPR Scotland was delighted to host a daylong conference on October 29.