The Wrong Stuff. Creative class theory, diversity and city performance
Article
Richard Florida's well-known 'creative class' theory suggests that diverse, tolerant and cool cities will outperform other places. Cities with more ethnic minorities, gay people and counter-culturalists will attract high-skilled professionals: the presence of this 'creative class' ensures cities get the best jobs and most dynamic companies. Much of Florida's research concentrates on American cities. Does it work in the UK?
This paper examines Florida's ideas, focusing on the evidence in British cities. It finds little evidence of a 'creative class', and little evidence that 'creative' cities do better. Businesses look for skilled workers when making location decisions, but skilled people also move to where the jobs are. Buzz attracts young people to city centres for a short time, after which most move out to suburbs.
The paper concludes that the creative class model is a poor predictor of UK city performance. There is other, stronger evidence that diversity and creativity are linked to economic growth in cities, not least through rebranding and boosting tourism. Decisionmakers should focus on the basics: creativity is the icing, not the cake.
Centre for Cities has re-launched as an independent think tank. You can visit them online at http://www.centreforcities.org.
Related items

The full-speed economy: Does running a hotter economy benefit workers?
How a slightly hotter economy might be able to boost future growth.
Making the most of it: Unitarisation, hyperlocal democratic renewal and community empowerment
Local government reorganisation need not result in a weakening of democracy at the local level.
Transport and growth: Reforming transport investment for place-based growth
The ability to deliver transformative public transport is not constrained by a lack of ideas, public support or local ambition. It is constrained by the way decisions are taken at the national level.