Time for Another People's Budget
Article
This year's budget on 22 April will be the most important for many years. The UK economy is deep in recession; unemployment is widely expected to increase to 3 million; and independent forecasts suggest the Government's budget deficit will be around 10 per cent of GDP in 2009-10, even before any measures contained in the 2009 Budget. Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling faces the unenviable task of having to produce a package of measures that supports the economy in the short term, while providing reassurance that the deficit will be reduced in the medium term.
In this paper, we urge Darling to look to the great reforming Chancellor David Lloyd George for inspiration. Almost 100 years to the day before this year's budget, on 29 April 1909, Lloyd George presented arguably the most famous, the most radical and the greatest UK budget. He made the moral case for taxation to finance welfare spending and established the principle of a progressive tax system. The budget was such a success that it was given a soubriquet and is now known as the 'People's Budget'.
Alistair Darling should be as bold as Lloyd George was 100 years ago. To counter the recessionary forces in the economy, he should propose a package of measures that includes:
- A substantial increase in personal tax allowances
- Extra spending to achieve the Government's child poverty reduction target
- Extra spending on low-carbon technology
- An immediate restoration of the link between pensions and earnings.
Related items

New world, new relationship: Our future with Europe
Britain’s assumptions about its place in the world no longer hold, upturned by Russian aggression, American unreliability and Chinese coercion.
A durable majority?: How public opinion on the EU performs under pressure
A decade on from Brexit, Andy Burnham has signalled that a reassessment of the UK’s relationship with the EU might be around the corner.
Allies for delivery: Rebuilding faith in Scottish politics via the North Sea
Can Scottish politicians still build enough of a consensus to deliver meaningful change for disillusioned voters?