10 years of austerity: Eroding resilience in the North

Article

Ten years after it was first introduced, new research finds that austerity has had a disproportionately damaging impact upon the North of England’s resilience and its capacity to deal with the social and economic impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic.

On 22nd June 2010, George Osborne, the Chancellor who would later coin the phrase ‘The Northern Powerhouse’, delivered his now infamous austerity budget with its programme of significant cuts in public spending. At the time, Osborne stressed that the pain would be shared: “we are all in this together” and the government would “protect the most vulnerable in our society”.

Ten years on, our analysis of the impacts of austerity shows how the North of England has been disproportionately affected by spending cuts, particularly those to local government. The North now faces one of the most serious social and economic crises in living memory, but austerity has significantly reduced the region’s resilience and in doing so, its capacity for recovery.

Related items

  1. The Bank of England is watched over by a statue of the Duke of Wellington seated on his horse

    Fixing the leak: How to end the £22 billion annual taxpayer losses at the Bank of England

    The Bank of England increased its interest rates over recent years, aimed at reducing inflation. But this has also had an unintended effect on the Bank of England’s massive government bond buying – ‘quantitative easing’ – programme. 
  2. A two way street with busy traffic of driving cars and double-decker buses in autumn

    Fairer is faster: The route to greener and healthier domestic transport

    The government can speed up efforts to decarbonise transport by targeting the highest emitters.
  3. View of Bank of England, Royal Exchange, and Duke of Wellington equestrian statue (1844) with skyscrapers and construction in background.

    Navigating in the fog: Why the OBR should hold its nerve on the productivity forecast

    The fiscal watchdog is under pressure to downgrade its forecast, costing the chancellor billions – but this would be premature.