Back on the market: Bringing empty homes back into use
How could we bring more of Britain's empty houses back onto the market?Article
There are estimated to be around 635,000 empty homes in England. Of those, 216,000 homes (or just over one-third) have been unoccupied for longer than six months, including some 22,000 in London, where housing pressures are particularly intense. It is notable that the vast majority of these homes are in private hands, with private owners accounting for 91 per cent of all empty dwellings, and probably an even higher percentage of all long-term empty homes.
The challenge is to address this imbalance in the market, when incentives on homeowners to fill or sell empty homes are weak, and when regional variations raise the risk, for example, of inadvertently punishing landlords who are genuinely trying but unable to fill a vacant property.
In this briefing, we argue that local authorities should be offered an enhanced set of powers to address the problem. In particular, incentives for authorities to use the powers they already have should be heightened, in order to widen the policy net and ensure more empty homes are captured by the existing policies and penalties.
We recommend two small but significant changes to the current rules.
- The existing cap on the 'empty homes council tax premium' should be removed, effectively allowing local authorities to determine their own banded premiums charged on long-term empty dwellings.
- Local authority discretion should extend beyond rate setting to include definitions of the properties that are subject to it – in particular, they should be able to set different long-term empty 'thresholds', in order to define locally what a long-term empty property is, for example, by declaring homes to be 'long-term empty' after a shorter period, or requiring a longer period of residence in order to reset the clock.
Related items
Transformed by AI: How generative artificial intelligence could affect work in the UK – and how to manage it
Technological change is a good thing. It has brought exponential gains to living standards and is the foundation of modern society. Yet unmanaged technological change has always come with risks and disruptions.Celebrating 20 years of IPPR North
For two decades IPPR North has been at the centre of the debate about how to rebalance England's regions. Here we take stock of how far we have come and the role we have played in shaping the "levelling up" debate.Costing the Rwanda plan
Total payments to Rwanda for removing this cohort of people could range between £1.1 billion and £3.9 billion.