Greasing the wheels: Getting our bus and rail markets on the move
Article
This report focuses on the relationship between public and private stakes in rail services, and differences between bus services in London and elsewhere.
Our analysis examines the pros and cons of existing policy for both of these transport markets. While policy for London buses seems to be performing reasonably well, there are challenges facing rail which need addressing, though these pale in comparison to those facing bus markets outside London.
Policy recommendations for rail cover:
- allowing public sector rail operators to compete for franchises, including as part of a joint venture with private companies
- handing responsibility for franchising decisions to the Office of Rail Regulation
- encouraging train operating companies (TOCs) to contribute more towards infrastructure costs and reduce the burden on taxpayers
Recommendations focused on bus services outside London include:
- giving greater powers and responsibilities to local bodies to shape local bus markets
- replicating the Transport for London (TfL) model at the city-region and combined authority level
- greater integration of transport spending and services by health and education providers (such as hospital shuttles and school buses)
- a new long-term, national transport strategy, to be written and owned by the Department for Transport.
Related items

Brexit 10 years on: Time the North took back control through devolution
Why does 'take back control' not extend to devolution?
English devolution and migration: A role for strategic authorities
As English devolution accelerates, strategic authorities are becoming more important actors in policy areas that shape how people settle, integrate and build lives in local communities.
Windrush Day: The unfinished business of immigration reform
Eight years after the Windrush scandal, its lessons remain highly relevant to debates about immigration policy today.