Fair funding for mental health: Putting parity into practice
Article
The case for bold action to address poor mental health in the UK – both on moral and economic grounds – is strikingly clear. Fortunately, politicians of all political persuasions are increasingly recognising this fact. This has primarily manifested itself in calls for investment in mental health treatment – and to a lesser extent actions on the social determinants of mental health – to help achieve ‘parity of esteem’ between mental and physical health. More recently, the prime minister, Theresa May, has personally made this one of her priorities, accurately describing it as a “burning injustice”.
The NHS’s 70th birthday present – a new funding deal worth an extra £20 billion per year by 2023 – is an opportunity to deliver a better life for those living with poor mental health. The NHS is in the process of authoring a long-term plan that will set out what it wants to achieve with this additional funding and how this funding will be allocated. It is crucial that this plan raises our ambitions on mental health: despite accounting for 23 per cent of the disease burden, mental health gets just 11 per cent of the NHS budget (Mental Health Taskforce 2016). This must change: we need to be clear what success – ‘parity of esteem’ – looks like and how much it will cost to get there. These are the questions that this briefing paper sets out to answer.
Related items

Bottleneck Britain: How digital competition could power UK growth and sovereignty
Artificial intelligence could be the UK’s biggest economic opportunity in a generation, but only if its gains are spread across the economy rather than pooled within a handful of companies.
Taxing times: Policies, politics, and principles
This paper sets out proposals for the path to a better tax system, which is able to meet the demands of both the public and a more dangerous world.
Towards a Communities Agenda 2.0
Andy Burnham’s arrival in Downing Street creates an opportunity to go much further on the communities agenda than we’ve seen up to now. So what should more ambition look like in practice?